<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mainstream Beer Ads &#8211; A Rant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boozereviews.net/beer/mainstream-beer-ads-a-rant/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boozereviews.net/beer/mainstream-beer-ads-a-rant</link>
	<description>The drinking man's guide to fine (and not so fine) beer, wine and spirits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Juanote</title>
		<link>http://www.boozereviews.net/beer/mainstream-beer-ads-a-rant#comment-2323</link>
		<dc:creator>Juanote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boozereviews.net/?p=604#comment-2323</guid>
		<description>Sorry, connoisseur is indeed more appropriate.  And I forgot to mention that I do lean towards a nice, crisp IPA these days...

Yeah, I think &quot;Drinkability&quot; is another entire post.  I mean, if  it pissed me off because &quot;triple hops brewed&quot; simply re-states the obvious, &quot;Drinkability&quot; enters into an entirely new realm of obvious.  The screenplay looks like this:

MAN WITH DEEP, SONOROUS VOICE (ENTHUSIASTICALLY):
Drinkability.  Yeeaah.  You can actually &lt;em&gt;drink&lt;/em&gt; our beer.  You know those other beers, the ones you simply pour all over your nuts before sex?  We&#039;re not one of those.  With our beer, the Drinkable beer known as Buttwiper, you can actually put it in this thing we call a &quot;refrigerator&quot; and get it cold, then you can put your lips up to the can and a cool, amber liquid coats your tongue.  Then-- and this is the kicker -- you get to swallow it.  Imagine that.  Just sit back for a second and imagine... &lt;em&gt;swallowing&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, connoisseur is indeed more appropriate.  And I forgot to mention that I do lean towards a nice, crisp IPA these days&#8230;</p>
<p>Yeah, I think &#8220;Drinkability&#8221; is another entire post.  I mean, if  it pissed me off because &#8220;triple hops brewed&#8221; simply re-states the obvious, &#8220;Drinkability&#8221; enters into an entirely new realm of obvious.  The screenplay looks like this:</p>
<p>MAN WITH DEEP, SONOROUS VOICE (ENTHUSIASTICALLY):<br />
Drinkability.  Yeeaah.  You can actually <em>drink</em> our beer.  You know those other beers, the ones you simply pour all over your nuts before sex?  We&#8217;re not one of those.  With our beer, the Drinkable beer known as Buttwiper, you can actually put it in this thing we call a &#8220;refrigerator&#8221; and get it cold, then you can put your lips up to the can and a cool, amber liquid coats your tongue.  Then&#8211; and this is the kicker &#8212; you get to swallow it.  Imagine that.  Just sit back for a second and imagine&#8230; <em>swallowing</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J David</title>
		<link>http://www.boozereviews.net/beer/mainstream-beer-ads-a-rant#comment-2319</link>
		<dc:creator>J David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boozereviews.net/?p=604#comment-2319</guid>
		<description>Uh, I prefer the moniker &quot;connoisseur&quot; of fine beer (and wine), which of course is a euphemism for &quot;snob&quot;.  However, I have been known to enjoy a Pacifico, or ten, while sweltering in the heat.  In fact I still love Pacifico for what it is.  I might even throw some lime in it.  

If you surveyed 100 Miller drinkers, how many of them would know shit about brewing?  10?  

How about Coors and their &quot;Cold Activated Can&quot;?  Let me see, I have this can of beer in my hand, can I trust my senses to tell me whether it is cold enough to drink?  No.  Good thing I can look on the can to see that the mountains have turned blue, telling me to move forward.  Asinine.  

Don&#039;t even get me started on &quot;Drinkability&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, I prefer the moniker &#8220;connoisseur&#8221; of fine beer (and wine), which of course is a euphemism for &#8220;snob&#8221;.  However, I have been known to enjoy a Pacifico, or ten, while sweltering in the heat.  In fact I still love Pacifico for what it is.  I might even throw some lime in it.  </p>
<p>If you surveyed 100 Miller drinkers, how many of them would know shit about brewing?  10?  </p>
<p>How about Coors and their &#8220;Cold Activated Can&#8221;?  Let me see, I have this can of beer in my hand, can I trust my senses to tell me whether it is cold enough to drink?  No.  Good thing I can look on the can to see that the mountains have turned blue, telling me to move forward.  Asinine.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t even get me started on &#8220;Drinkability&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
